Under the age of consent
Did you click this hoping for pictures?
A story perhaps?
...you fucking sick little monkey.
In reviewing it's more sorting out of the photos and videos then "reviewing" anything. I mean it's not like we are film and media critics. Mostly reviewers get rid of copyrighted and offensive material like c***d pornography. Yeah surprisingly there is a LOT of the later being uploaded to xHamster. Of course I can't blame everybody who uploads it because what's 'legal age of consent' in backwater country under Shari'a law (where it's technically OK to nail a 9 year old girl) or Somalia or any other sub-Saharan African shit hole where age really doesn't matter then it might be OK to upload pictures of Little Fiona 14 year old. HOWEVER, here in the civilized western world we GENERALLY consider it OK for a girl of 18 to be flashing her titties and other girl parts let alone film herself swallowing a man mean sam'ich and anything younger is, well, verboten.
So I can see why some quasi-civilized, barely literate third world knuckle drager could possibly upload some of his personal photo collection of what he considers legal content thinking that the rest of us will find it just as much of an erotic turn on as he does. Even though I see why someone might think this way it still doesn't' mean it's acceptable. There is a reason that the vast majority of the world doesn't have sex with c***dren or find c***dren sexually exciting. I won't say that reason is due to something as comical as 'religious beliefs' because as I mentioned it's OK to marry and shag 9 year old girls under Shari'a law and I won't attribute our reprehension to sex with c***dren to something as debatable as morals either. No it has to be something hardwired into our DNA.
Repulsion to c***d pornography is inherently part of who we are as a species and as such anybody who finds it appealing has something fundamentally wrong with them. They are abnormal and broken in such a fundamental way that they can not be repaired. So by this infallible rationality even the people who dwell on the side of the planet where dirt floors are considered normal and people still don't have clean running water who find c***dren attractive are just as broken as any of the others.
PLEASE...feel free to disagree with me and post it. I'll feel free to watch you like a hawk from your post forward. The only kind of arguably human being who could defend c***d pornography or sex with c***dren has to be the same kind of person who enjoys sex with c***dren.
No exceptions.
...meanwhile in Texas...
A story perhaps?
...you fucking sick little monkey.
In reviewing it's more sorting out of the photos and videos then "reviewing" anything. I mean it's not like we are film and media critics. Mostly reviewers get rid of copyrighted and offensive material like c***d pornography. Yeah surprisingly there is a LOT of the later being uploaded to xHamster. Of course I can't blame everybody who uploads it because what's 'legal age of consent' in backwater country under Shari'a law (where it's technically OK to nail a 9 year old girl) or Somalia or any other sub-Saharan African shit hole where age really doesn't matter then it might be OK to upload pictures of Little Fiona 14 year old. HOWEVER, here in the civilized western world we GENERALLY consider it OK for a girl of 18 to be flashing her titties and other girl parts let alone film herself swallowing a man mean sam'ich and anything younger is, well, verboten.
So I can see why some quasi-civilized, barely literate third world knuckle drager could possibly upload some of his personal photo collection of what he considers legal content thinking that the rest of us will find it just as much of an erotic turn on as he does. Even though I see why someone might think this way it still doesn't' mean it's acceptable. There is a reason that the vast majority of the world doesn't have sex with c***dren or find c***dren sexually exciting. I won't say that reason is due to something as comical as 'religious beliefs' because as I mentioned it's OK to marry and shag 9 year old girls under Shari'a law and I won't attribute our reprehension to sex with c***dren to something as debatable as morals either. No it has to be something hardwired into our DNA.
Repulsion to c***d pornography is inherently part of who we are as a species and as such anybody who finds it appealing has something fundamentally wrong with them. They are abnormal and broken in such a fundamental way that they can not be repaired. So by this infallible rationality even the people who dwell on the side of the planet where dirt floors are considered normal and people still don't have clean running water who find c***dren attractive are just as broken as any of the others.
PLEASE...feel free to disagree with me and post it. I'll feel free to watch you like a hawk from your post forward. The only kind of arguably human being who could defend c***d pornography or sex with c***dren has to be the same kind of person who enjoys sex with c***dren.
No exceptions.
...meanwhile in Texas...
11 years ago
) You post. I click. I'm just a nosy bitch like that. But enough of all that...I concur with everything you have said. That's it. That's all. I'm done.